Enfusion, Inc. ENFN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1868912Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Oct 2021 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Oct 2021 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Oct 2021 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Davis Polk | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Morgan Lewis | Oct 2021 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Oct 2021 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Oct 2021 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Gregg L. KatzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Jesse NevarezGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Shane TintleDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- R. Alec DawsonMorgan LewisFirst linked Oct 2021 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis Polk | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Gregg L. KatzGoodwin Procter | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Jesse NevarezGoodwin Procter | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Shane TintleDavis Polk | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| R. Alec DawsonMorgan Lewis | Oct 2021 | Text search only | 15 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.86 |