Chenghe Acquisition I Co. LATG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1868269Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bill NelsonShearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Emily LeitchShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Maurice BlancoDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Pedro J. BermeoDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- William B. NelsonHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Michael DavisDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill NelsonShearman & Sterling | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Emily LeitchShearman & Sterling | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Maurice BlancoDavis Polk | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| Pedro J. BermeoDavis Polk | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| William B. NelsonHaynes and Boone | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Michael DavisDavis Polk | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 25 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.65 |