Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1867096Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| A&L Goodbody | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Arthur Cox | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Holland & Knight | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joe TheisGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Andrew H. GoodmanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Stephanie A. RichardsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe TheisGoodwin Procter | Mar 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 109 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Andrew H. GoodmanGoodwin Procter | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin Procter | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Stephanie A. RichardsGoodwin Procter | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 |