Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. EMAT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1866226Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anthony, Linder & Cacomanolis, PLLCFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Hunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 251 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Shin & KimFirst linked Nov 2024 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony, Linder & Cacomanolis, PLLC | Nov 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Pryor Cashman | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Hunter Taubman Fischer | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 251 | 1.06 | 1.77 | 1.12 |
| Shin & Kim | Nov 2024 | Text search only | 22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Craig D. LinderAnthony L.G., PLLCFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 1.21× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Laura AnthonyAnthony L.G., PLLCFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Eric M. HelligePryor CashmanFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- David SilvermanCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- M. Ali PanjwaniPryor CashmanFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 2.24× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Timothy PitrelliCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Will H. CaiCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Jonathan DeblingerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Hunter Taubman Fischer LiHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 309 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig D. LinderAnthony L.G., PLLC | Nov 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 1.04 | 1.21 | 1.07 |
| Laura AnthonyAnthony L.G., PLLC | Nov 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.10 | 1.91 | 1.03 |
| Eric M. HelligePryor Cashman | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.02 | 1.64 | 1.65 |
| David SilvermanCooley LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| M. Ali PanjwaniPryor Cashman | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 80 | 2.02 | 2.24 | 1.25 |
| Timothy PitrelliCooley LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Will H. CaiCooley LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 73 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Jonathan DeblingerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |
| Hunter Taubman Fischer LiHunter Taubman Fischer | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 309 | 0.82 | 1.30 | 1.18 |