Cactus Acquisition Corp. 1 Ltd CCTS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1865861Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 841 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 558 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 841 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.13 |
| Maples and Calder | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 558 | 0.98 | 0.61 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gary EmmanuelMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 181 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Jonathan M. NathanMeitar Law OfficesFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Mark SelingerMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary EmmanuelMcDermott Will & Emery | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.77 | 1.18 | 1.05 |
| Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 181 | 1.07 | 0.43 | 1.21 |
| Jonathan M. NathanMeitar Law Offices | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Mark SelingerMcDermott Will & Emery | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.22 |