FAT PROJECTS ACQUISITION CORP FATP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1865045Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in a filing · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- The Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Pinsent MasonsFirst linked Oct 2022 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Oct 2022 | Named in a filing | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| The Loev Law Firm, PC | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 91 | 1.27 | 1.16 | 1.07 |
| Nelson Mullins | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
| Pinsent Masons | Oct 2022 | Text search only | 27 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew M. TuckerNelson MullinsFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Oct 2022 · Text search only · 188 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Andy TuckerNelson MullinsFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew M. TuckerNelson Mullins | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLP | Oct 2022 | Text search only | 188 | 1.24 | 1.81 | 1.24 |
| Andy TuckerNelson Mullins | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 |