Allarity Therapeutics, Inc. ALLR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1860657Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 100%
- Dec 2021 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Venable LLPFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Mar 2023 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venable LLP | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Blank Rome | Mar 2023 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Dechert LLP | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Morgan Lewis | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arif SotoVenable LLPFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 8.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- William N. HaddadVenable LLPFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Daniel B. EngLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Scott E. BartelLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- David E. SchulmanDechert LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arif SotoVenable LLP | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 8.18 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| William N. HaddadVenable LLP | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 1.71 | 0.41 | 1.36 |
| Daniel B. EngLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.38 | 1.41 | 1.19 |
| Scott E. BartelLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.36 | 0.73 | 0.81 |
| David E. SchulmanDechert LLP | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 16 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.59 |