Roth CH Acquisition Co. USCT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1860514Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked May 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- White & CaseFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Oct 2021 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | May 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| White & Case | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Maples and Calder | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Winston & Strawn | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Oct 2021 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexandria KaneLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked May 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Elliott M. SmithWhite & CaseFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Carol Anne HuffKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandria KaneLoeb & Loeb LLP | May 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Elliott M. SmithWhite & Case | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.26 | 0.51 | 1.11 |
| Carol Anne HuffKirkland & Ellis | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.70 |