TIGO ENERGY, INC. TYGO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1855447Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jul 2023 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- White & CaseFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 841 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Feb 2023 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2022 · Text search only · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| White & Case | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 841 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.13 |
| Akin Gump | Feb 2023 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.18 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2022 | Text search only | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Graubard Miller | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joel L. RubensteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked May 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Colin J. DiamondWhite & CaseFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 83 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Laura Katherine MannWhite & CaseFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Steven D. PidgeonDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 181 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Bryan J. LuchsWhite & CaseFirst linked Dec 2022 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joel L. RubensteinWhite & Case | Nov 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | May 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.04 |
| Colin J. DiamondWhite & Case | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 83 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Laura Katherine MannWhite & Case | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Steven D. PidgeonDLA Piper | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.01 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.28 |
| Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 181 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 1.22 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 1.19 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 1.22 |
| Bryan J. LuchsWhite & Case | Dec 2022 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.85 |