Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd ATAT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1853717Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- JunHe LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2023 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| JunHe LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Maples and Calder | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2023 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Kevin ZhangDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Allen C. WangLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Li HeDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Miranda SoDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Kevin ZhangDavis Polk | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Allen C. WangLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| Li HeDavis Polk | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Miranda SoDavis Polk | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 33 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.68 |