Marti Technologies, Inc. MRT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1852767Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Aug 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- White & CaseFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Aug 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| White & Case | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Willkie Farr | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Maples and Calder | Apr 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elliott M. SmithWhite & CaseFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Laura SizemoreWhite & CaseFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel BreslinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Danielle ScalzoWillkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Michael BrandtWillkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 135 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Scott W. WesthoffLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Alan I. AnnexGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in a filing · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Jason T. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 120 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- William H. GumpWillkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2022 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elliott M. SmithWhite & Case | Nov 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.26 | 0.51 | 1.10 |
| Laura SizemoreWhite & Case | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel BreslinLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Danielle ScalzoWillkie Farr | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Michael BrandtWillkie Farr | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 135 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Scott W. WesthoffLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Alan I. AnnexGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2021 | Named in a filing | 153 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 1.12 |
| Jason T. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 120 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 1.13 |
| William H. GumpWillkie Farr | Dec 2022 | Text search only | 16 | 1.56 | 1.01 | 0.69 |