Missfresh Ltd
CIK 1851682Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Han KunFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked May 2021 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Jingtian & GongchengFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Han Kun | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.85 |
| Maples and Calder | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Paul Hastings | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | May 2021 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.80 |
| Jingtian & Gongcheng | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 154 | 1.10 | 0.63 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Li HeDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Li HeDavis Polk | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |