Akili, Inc. AKLI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1850266Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jan 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Aug 2022 to Feb 2024
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2022 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2022 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Apr 2022 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Maples and Calder | Apr 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2021 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Apr 2022 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2022 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Cooley LLP | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua M. ZachariahKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William A. MagioncaldaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Dan EspinozaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Sarah AshfaqGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Patrick O BrienRopes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Paul D. TroppRopes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua M. ZachariahKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2024 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William A. MagioncaldaGoodwin Procter | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin Procter | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Dan EspinozaGoodwin Procter | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Sarah AshfaqGoodwin Procter | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Patrick O BrienRopes & Gray | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Paul D. TroppRopes & Gray | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.94 |