SEP Acquisition Corp. SEPA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1849902Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 1.13 |
| Sidley Austin | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Tonya Mitchem GrindonBaker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Curtis L. MoBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 1.98×
- David C. BuckAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
- David NiSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Joshua DuClosSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tonya Mitchem GrindonBaker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.54 | 1.24 | 1.92 |
| Curtis L. MoBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.98 |
| David C. BuckAndrews Kurth LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.98 | 1.26 | 2.10 |
| David NiSidley Austin | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA Piper | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.05 | 1.34 | 1.25 |
| Joshua DuClosSidley Austin | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 1.93 |