MSD Investment Corp.
CIK 1849894Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 1.70 | 0.63 | 0.63 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Morgan Lewis | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Nixon Peabody | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Pryor Cashman | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Reed Smith | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven B. BoehmEversheds Sutherland (US) LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Payam SiadatpourEversheds Sutherland (US) LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven B. BoehmEversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Payam SiadatpourEversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 5 | 3.21 | 0.00 | 1.72 |