Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc CNTA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1847903Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2026 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Smith AndersonFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2026 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | May 2021 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2021 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Dechert LLP | May 2021 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| HALE AND DORR | May 2021 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Smith Anderson | May 2021 | Text search only | 67 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2021 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Reed Smith | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Ropes & Gray | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edwin O ConnorGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Edwin M. O ConnorGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- James XuGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Mitch BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Claire Keast-ButlerCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edwin O ConnorGoodwin Procter | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Edwin M. O ConnorGoodwin Procter | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| James XuGoodwin Procter | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 109 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Mitch BloomGoodwin Procter | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Claire Keast-ButlerCooley LLP | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.85 |