Couchbase, Inc. BASE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1845022Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard C. BlakeGunderson DettmerFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Emily RobertsDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Andrew T. HillWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.54×
- Craig M. SchmitzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 3.35× · 95% wipeout 2.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard C. BlakeGunderson Dettmer | Jul 2021 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Emily RobertsDavis Polk | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Andrew T. HillWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 2.54 |
| Craig M. SchmitzGoodwin Procter | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 13 | 1.41 | 3.35 | 2.79 |