QT IMAGING HOLDINGS, INC. QTI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1844505Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2023 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Feb 2023 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2023 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Feb 2023 | Text search only | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John F. MaselliDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Anthony AinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Elena NrtinaDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- James A. PrestianoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2023 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2023 · Text search only · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John F. MaselliDLA Piper | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Anthony AinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Elena NrtinaDLA Piper | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA Piper | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.05 | 1.34 | 1.26 |
| Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 0.95 | 1.58 | 0.98 |
| James A. PrestianoLoeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2023 | Text search only | 12 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2023 | Text search only | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |