Marpai, Inc. MRAI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1844392Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Oct 2021 to Apr 2026
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 212 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Pearl CohenFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 212 | 0.95 | 0.45 | 1.06 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Pearl Cohen | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 44 | 1.15 | 0.68 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ron Ben-BassatSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 3.59× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Angela M. DowdLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Jane K. P. TamLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ron Ben-BassatSullivan & Worcester LLP | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.44 | 3.59 | 0.90 |
| Angela M. DowdLoeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.94 | 1.45 | 1.52 |
| Jane K. P. TamLoeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |