two TWOA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1843988Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Mar 2024 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Gregory P. Patti Jr.Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Bill NelsonShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- William B. NelsonHaynes and BooneFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 0.95 | 1.58 | 0.97 |
| Gregory P. Patti Jr.Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 3.44 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Bill NelsonShearman & Sterling | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| William B. NelsonHaynes and Boone | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 37 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.72 |