SIMILARWEB LTD. SMWB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1842731Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Meitar Law OfficesFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Cooley LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Meitar Law Offices | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 61 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jon VenickDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Penny J. MinnaDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Josh KiernanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David GlattFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- David BolesCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Nathan AjiashviliLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Nicole BrookshireCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Stephane LevyCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jon VenickDLA Piper | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Penny J. MinnaDLA Piper | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Josh KiernanLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David Glatt | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| David BolesCooley LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Nathan AjiashviliLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Nicole BrookshireCooley LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Stephane LevyCooley LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.78 |