OPAL Fuels Inc. OPAL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1842279Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- MCNEES WALLACE & NURICKFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard Mullin | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Winston & Strawn | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 17 | 0.69 | 1.22 | 0.44 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexander M. SchwartzSheppard MullinFirst linked Sep 2026 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Seth A. LemingsSheppard MullinFirst linked Sep 2026 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Edward WelchSheppard MullinFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Eric JohnsonLocke LordFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 2.06× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Michael J. BlankenshipWinston & StrawnFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.23× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- John H. BooherHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Jennifer WuKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- James S. RoweKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander M. SchwartzSheppard Mullin | Sep 2026 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Seth A. LemingsSheppard Mullin | Sep 2026 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Edward WelchSheppard Mullin | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Eric JohnsonLocke Lord | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.20 | 2.06 | 1.34 |
| Michael J. BlankenshipWinston & Strawn | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 0.23 | 1.13 | 1.05 |
| John H. BooherHogan Lovells US LLP | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Jennifer WuKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| James S. RoweKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |