Local Bounti Corporation/DE LOCL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1840780Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2021 to Nov 2026
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2022 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Cooley LLP | Jun 2022 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| King & Spalding | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Albert VanderlaanOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Brooks W. AntweilKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Matthew GemelloOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Christopher J. CapuzziRopes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Paul D. TroppRopes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert VanderlaanOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Brooks W. AntweilKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 2.92 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Matthew GemelloOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jul 2021 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.86 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Christopher J. CapuzziRopes & Gray | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 56 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Paul D. TroppRopes & Gray | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 108 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 73 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.17 |