Hagerty, Inc. HGTY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1840776Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Sidley Austin | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew LedbetterDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kevin CriddleDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- William D. HowellBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 181 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew LedbetterDLA Piper | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Kevin CriddleDLA Piper | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| William D. HowellBaker Botts L.L.P. | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 181 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 1.21 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |