MiNK Therapeutics, Inc. INKT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1840229Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Nov 2021 to Dec 2024
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Oct 2021 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Dechert LLP | Oct 2021 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Paul KinsellaRopes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Thomas J. DanielskiRopes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Zachary BlumeRopes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 1.55 | 1.08 | 1.36 |
| Paul KinsellaRopes & Gray | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 0.66 |
| Thomas J. DanielskiRopes & Gray | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Zachary BlumeRopes & Gray | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.30 | 1.69 | 0.52 |