Getaround, Inc GETR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1839608Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2022 to Aug 2025
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Jun 2024 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2022 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| White & Case | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Covington & Burling | Jun 2024 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2022 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2022 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Grant J. LevineGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Kevin FriedmannRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
- Laurie L. GreenGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- William L. HughesFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Alan I. AnnexGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Daniel E. NussenWhite & CaseFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Matthew GemelloOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant J. LevineGreenberg Traurig | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Kevin FriedmannRichardson & Patel LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.80 | 1.73 | 2.22 |
| Laurie L. GreenGreenberg Traurig | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| William L. HughesFenwick & West LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.12 | 0.94 | 1.37 |
| Alan I. AnnexGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 153 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 1.15 |
| Daniel E. NussenWhite & Case | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |
| Matthew GemelloOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jul 2022 | Text search only | 8 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.86 |