SunPower Inc. SPWR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1838987Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jun 2023 to Apr 2024
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Dec 2024 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Feb 2023 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnold & Porter | Jul 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Cooley LLP | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Paul Hastings | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Duane Morris | Dec 2024 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Feb 2023 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael PenneyArnold & PorterFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- David M. HernandLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.48×
- John T. McKennaCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Matthew B. HemingtonCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Brandon J. BortnerPaul HastingsFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Pedro J. BermeoDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- James T. SeeryDuane MorrisFirst linked Dec 2024 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael PenneyArnold & Porter | Jul 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| David M. HernandLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.48 |
| John T. McKennaCooley LLP | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 1.10 |
| Matthew B. HemingtonCooley LLP | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.88 | 1.09 | 0.96 |
| Brandon J. BortnerPaul Hastings | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.20 | 1.54 | 1.32 |
| Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis Polk | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Pedro J. BermeoDavis Polk | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| James T. SeeryDuane Morris | Dec 2024 | Text search only | 76 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 1.14 |