AlTi Global, Inc. ALTI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1838615Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Apr 2023 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2022 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Apr 2023 | Text search only | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2022 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Proskauer Rose | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas MartinDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Jeffrey A. LetalienGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Samantha M. KirbyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas R. MartinGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Adam NamouryGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Alan I. AnnexGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Jason T. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 120 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Brett NadritchMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked May 2023 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas MartinDorsey & Whitney LLP | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Jeffrey A. LetalienGoodwin Procter | Feb 2022 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Samantha M. KirbyGoodwin Procter | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas R. MartinGreenberg Traurig | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 3.64 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Adam NamouryGreenberg Traurig | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Alan I. AnnexGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 153 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 1.15 |
| Jason T. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 120 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 1.11 |
| Brett NadritchMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | May 2023 | Text search only | 22 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.16 |