Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. YMM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1838413Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- CM LawFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- King & WoodFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM Law | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| King & Wood | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Yi GaoSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Li HeDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yi GaoSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2021 | Text search only | 39 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2021 | Text search only | 36 | 1.16 | 0.85 | 1.41 |
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Li HeDavis Polk | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 53 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.61 |