PepGen Inc. PEPG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1835597Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2026 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Oct 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Paul Hastings | Apr 2026 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Morgan Lewis | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edwin O ConnorGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Alicia M. TschirhartGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- James XuGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Richard A. HoffmanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Jennifer FangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edwin O ConnorGoodwin Procter | Mar 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Alicia M. TschirhartGoodwin Procter | Oct 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| James XuGoodwin Procter | Oct 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Richard A. HoffmanGoodwin Procter | Oct 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Jennifer FangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.07 |