Invivyd, Inc. IVVD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1832038Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Sep 2021 to May 2022
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2021 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- McCarter & EnglishFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 141 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Cooley LLP | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2021 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| McCarter & English | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 141 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| HALE AND DORR | May 2021 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen M. NicolaiHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Steven J. AbramsHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Patrick GadsonVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Lawrence S. ElbaumVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Courtney TygessonCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Ryan SansomCooley LLPFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Jason L. KroppWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen M. NicolaiHogan Lovells US LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Steven J. AbramsHogan Lovells US LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Patrick GadsonVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Lawrence S. ElbaumVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Courtney TygessonCooley LLP | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Ryan SansomCooley LLP | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Jason L. KroppWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2021 | Text search only | 46 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.38 |