Tuya Inc. TUYA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1829118Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Sep 2023 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jingtian & GongchengFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Willkie Farr | Sep 2023 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.28 |
| Jingtian & Gongcheng | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 154 | 1.10 | 0.63 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Li HeDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Miranda SoDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Ran LiDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Li HeDavis Polk | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Miranda SoDavis Polk | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 33 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Ran LiDavis Polk | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 13 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 0.64 |