Viant Technology Inc. DSP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1828791Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Holland & Knight | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Drew CapurroLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Jenna CooperLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Thomas A. CollCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- C. Thomas HopkinsCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Su Lian LuCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Tom CollPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Phillip S. McGillCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- JOHN M. WILLIAMSGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Stewart L. McDowellGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drew CapurroLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Jenna CooperLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Thomas A. CollCooley LLP | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| C. Thomas HopkinsCooley LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Su Lian LuCooley LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Tom CollPillsbury Winthrop | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Phillip S. McGillCooley LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.85 |
| JOHN M. WILLIAMSGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Stewart L. McDowellGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.05 |