Poshmark, Inc. POSH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1825480Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Goodwin Procter | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sean M. DonahuePaul HastingsFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Emily RobertsDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Anthony J. McCuskerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Heidi E. MayonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sean M. DonahuePaul Hastings | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Emily RobertsDavis Polk | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Anthony J. McCuskerGoodwin Procter | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.19 | 1.08 | 0.75 |
| Heidi E. MayonGoodwin Procter | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.41 |