Biotech Acquisition Co BIOTU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1825413Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,669 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,669 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Maples and Calder | Sep 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Covington & Burling | May 2022 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Richard BaumannEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 2.06× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 339 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Lawrence A. RosenbloomEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 417 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Matthew T. GehlCovington & BurlingFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Matthew A. GrayEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Richard BaumannEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.63 | 2.06 | 1.46 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 339 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| Lawrence A. RosenbloomEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 1.17 | 1.35 | 1.24 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 417 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 1.02 |
| Matthew T. GehlCovington & Burling | May 2022 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Matthew A. GrayEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 42 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.44 |