HH&L Acquisition Co. HHLA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1824185Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Dec 2022 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- AllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Nov 2022 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- King & WoodFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Maples and Calder | Sep 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Morgan Lewis | Dec 2022 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| AllBright Law Offices | Nov 2022 | Text search only | 106 | 0.72 | 1.49 | 1.16 |
| King & Wood | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Joel L. RubensteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Jessica ZhouWhite & CaseFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.57×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Joel L. RubensteinWhite & Case | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Jessica ZhouWhite & Case | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.57 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |