NUSCALE POWER Corp SMR (last ticker on record)

CIK 1822966Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Jan 2024
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 10; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 12; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Jan 8, 2024Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 22, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 10, 2021Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 7, 2021Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
O Melveny & Myers LLP	Aug 2025	Named in a filing	589	1.07	0.25	1.07
Stoel Rives	Jan 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	208	0.84	0.67	1.20
DLA Piper	May 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	1,184	1.00	0.45	1.20
Kirkland & Ellis	Sep 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP	Feb 2022	Text search only	161	1.26	0.00	0.83
Haynes and Boone	Jan 2022	Text search only	353	1.03	0.56	0.84
Winston & Strawn	Jan 2022	Text search only	585	1.18	0.60	1.02
Barton LLP	Jun 2021	Text search only	10	1.02	3.86	1.49
Maples and Calder	Sep 2020	Text search only	1,144	0.95	0.26	0.92
Shearman & Sterling	Sep 2020	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
David NiSidley Austin	Aug 2025	Named in a filing	18	0.00	0.00	0.78
David C. LeeGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	Jan 2022	Named in a filing	21	1.04	0.00	1.36
James M. KearneyStoel Rives	Jan 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	12	0.00	0.00	0.00
Jason M. BrauserStoel Rives	Jan 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	11	0.00	0.00	1.40
JOHN M. WILLIAMSGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	Jan 2022	Named in a filing	9	0.78	0.00	0.77
Lance K. HancockKirkland & Ellis	May 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	10	1.90	0.00	0.55
Scott A. CowanDLA Piper	May 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	11	0.00	3.25	0.61
Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & Ellis	Sep 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	72	0.48	0.00	1.14
Steven H. HullStoel Rives	Jul 2025	Text search only	11	0.97	3.83	1.38
Evan M. D AmicoGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	Jan 2022	Text search only	14	0.00	0.00	0.91
Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis	Sep 2020	Text search only	260	0.89	0.00	1.01
William B. NelsonHaynes and Boone	Sep 2020	Text search only	37	1.27	0.00	0.74