Array Technologies, Inc. ARRY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1820721Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Davis Polk | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Blank Rome | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rachel PhillipsRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel PhillipsRopes & Gray | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 2.03 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.89 |