Proterra Inc PTRAQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1820630Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Aug 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2021 to Aug 2023
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 2023 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in a filing · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Grady ChangCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Rachel ProffittCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.17×
- Sarah SellersCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- Dawn BeltFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- James S. RoweKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 2023 | Named in a filing | 88 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Grady ChangCooley LLP | Jan 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Rachel ProffittCooley LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.17 |
| Sarah SellersCooley LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.84 |
| Dawn BeltFenwick & West LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.90 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| James S. RoweKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |