Grindr Inc. GRND (last ticker on record)
CIK 1820144Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Dechert LLP | May 2022 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2022 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2022 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dave PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Garth OstermanCooley LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Kristin VanderPasCooley LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Neil Q. WhoriskeyCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Rod MillerMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dave PeinsippCooley LLP | Jan 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Garth OstermanCooley LLP | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Kristin VanderPasCooley LLP | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Neil Q. WhoriskeyCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Rod MillerMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.86 |