Redwire Corp RDW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1819810Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Jul 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Jun 2025 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- White & CaseFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Jun 2022 · Text search only · 138 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 4.29× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2021 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard Mullin | Jul 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.26 |
| Holland & Knight | Jun 2025 | Named in a filing | 413 | 1.16 | 0.82 | 1.21 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| White & Case | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Willkie Farr | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
| Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Jun 2022 | Text search only | 138 | 1.28 | 4.29 | 1.20 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2021 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2021 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | May 2021 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ana SemperteguiKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Alexander M. SchwartzSheppard MullinFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Sean M. EwenWillkie FarrFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Elliott M. SmithWhite & CaseFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- William H. GumpWillkie FarrFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- William B. SorabellaKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana SemperteguiKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Alexander M. SchwartzSheppard Mullin | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Sean M. EwenWillkie Farr | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Elliott M. SmithWhite & Case | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.26 | 0.51 | 1.10 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.04 |
| William H. GumpWillkie Farr | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.56 | 1.01 | 0.70 |
| William B. SorabellaKirkland & Ellis | May 2021 | Text search only | 14 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |