biote Corp. BTMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1819253Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| DLA Piper | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Bryan Cave | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter ByrneCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Michal BerknerCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Ryan SansomCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Sidney BurkeDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Stephen P. AlicantiDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Ari EdelmanReed SmithFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Erika L. WeinbergLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 135 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Lijia SanchezEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter ByrneCooley LLP | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Michal BerknerCooley LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Ryan SansomCooley LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Sidney BurkeDLA Piper | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Stephen P. AlicantiDLA Piper | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Ari EdelmanReed Smith | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Erika L. WeinbergLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.62 | 1.92 | 0.86 |
| Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 135 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |
| Lijia SanchezEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.05 |