AEye, Inc. LIDR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1818644Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Sep 2021 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Benesch Friedlander Coplan & AronoffFirst linked Jan 2026 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Allen Overy Shearman Sterling US LLPFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Aug 2024 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff | Jan 2026 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| Allen Overy Shearman Sterling US LLP | Jun 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| DLA Piper | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
| Graubard Miller | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Allen & Overy | Aug 2024 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Taylor E. LandryHunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 2026 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- William B. NelsonHaynes and BooneFirst linked May 2026 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Christopher M. ForresterShearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Andrew LedbetterDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Matthew A. GrayEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor E. LandryHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2026 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| William B. NelsonHaynes and Boone | May 2026 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Christopher M. ForresterShearman & Sterling | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Andrew LedbetterDLA Piper | Sep 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |
| Matthew A. GrayEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2021 | Text search only | 42 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.45 |