CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. CCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1818201Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Maples and Calder | Jul 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason FreedmanRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 6.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ross M. LeffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Thomas HoldenRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Christopher J. CapuzziRopes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2020 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Paul D. TroppRopes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2020 · Text search only · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason FreedmanRopes & Gray | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 6.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ross M. LeffKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Thomas HoldenRopes & Gray | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 73 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Christopher J. CapuzziRopes & Gray | Jul 2020 | Text search only | 56 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Paul D. TroppRopes & Gray | Jul 2020 | Text search only | 108 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.93 |