Nuburu, Inc. BURU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1814215Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2023 to Oct 2026
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holland & HartFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2022 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Sep 2022 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holland & Hart | Aug 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Willkie Farr | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| King & Spalding | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| White & Case | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Covington & Burling | Nov 2022 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Sidley Austin | Sep 2022 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Amy BowlerHolland & HartFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Mark B. BaudlerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Adam M. TurteltaubWillkie FarrFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Danielle ScalzoWillkie FarrFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Michael J. DanaherWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Michael S. HamiltonKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Aaron M. SchleicherSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Jonathan L. DavisKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy BowlerHolland & Hart | Nov 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.77 | 1.30 | 0.88 |
| Mark B. BaudlerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Adam M. TurteltaubWillkie Farr | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Danielle ScalzoWillkie Farr | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Michael J. DanaherWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.02 | 1.51 | 1.62 |
| Michael S. HamiltonKing & Spalding | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Aaron M. SchleicherSullivan & Worcester LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 73 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Jonathan L. DavisKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 19 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.82 |