Lucid Group, Inc. LCID (last ticker on record)
CIK 1811210Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Feb 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2021 to Oct 2026
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2024 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Morgan Lewis | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Thomas J. IveySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
- Emily RobertsDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in a filing · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Derek J. DostalDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2024 | Named in a filing | 37 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Thomas J. IveySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2024 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 2.10 |
| Emily RobertsDavis Polk | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Jun 2020 | Named in a filing | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |
| Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 72 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Derek J. DostalDavis Polk | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 114 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.22 |