Innovative Eyewear Inc LUCY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1808377Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2022 to Jul 2026
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Justin GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.72 | 1.81 | 1.21 |
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.44 |
| Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.71 | 1.90 | 1.68 |
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 187 | 0.98 | 1.26 | 1.35 |