Laser Photonics Corp LASE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1807887Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Sep 2024 to Nov 2026
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- CM LawFirst linked Sep 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Lucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Culhane Meadows PLLCFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM Law | Sep 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Lucosky Brookman LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 223 | 1.24 | 2.05 | 1.19 |
| Culhane Meadows PLLC | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. HartEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2026 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.76× · Went dark 13.23× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Thomas D. TwedtDow LohnesFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 188 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Ernest M. SternCulhane Meadows PLLCFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. HartEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2026 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.76 | 13.23 | 0.75 |
| Thomas D. TwedtDow Lohnes | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 188 | 1.24 | 1.81 | 1.24 |
| Ernest M. SternCulhane Meadows PLLC | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.73 | 1.50 | 1.14 |