CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORP CGC (last ticker on record)
CIK 18072Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Miller Nash LLPFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Miller Nash LLP | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- C. Kent CarlsonPreston Gates & EllisFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kristy T. HarlanK&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 2.84×
- Mary Ann FrantzMiller Nash LLPFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Kent CarlsonPreston Gates & Ellis | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kristy T. HarlanK&L Gates | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.62 | 1.73 | 2.84 |
| Mary Ann FrantzMiller Nash LLP | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.96 |