Vitru Ltd VTRU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1805012Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Mar 2020 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Mar 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Maples and Calder | Mar 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.80 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| Haynes and Boone | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.86 |
| Mayer Brown | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Mar 2020 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Manuel GarciadiazDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- John P. BerkeryMayer BrownFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Matthew L. FryHaynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Paul M. RodelDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel GarciadiazDavis Polk | Mar 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| John P. BerkeryMayer Brown | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 17 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Matthew L. FryHaynes and Boone | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 27 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Paul M. RodelDebevoise & Plimpton | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 11 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 1.03 |